[Mono-dev] SPAM-LOW: Re: [Mono-list] NUnit Version - Upgrade soon?

[Charlie Poole]

Ah ha! I saw nunit-console.dll in your post and assumed you
had re-written the console program for some reason. Now I'm
less confused. :-)

Charlie

> -----Original Message-----
> From: mono-list-bounces at lists.ximian.com 
> [mailto:mono-list-bounces at lists.ximian.com] On Behalf Of Atsushi Eno
> Sent: Tuesday, November 25, 2008 12:06 AM
> To: mono-list at lists.ximian.com; mono-devel-list at lists.ximian.com
> Subject: SPAM-LOW: Re: [Mono-list] NUnit Version - Upgrade soon?
> 
> Actually it turned out to be my bogus Makefile that assumed 
> nunit-console-runner.dll is nunit-console.dll, which was 
> conflicting nunit-console.exe and hence type loading failure 
> happened (and turned out that it should fail since foo.dll 
> and foo.exe cannot coexist).
> 
> Now I have a fixed version of nunit for our own use:
> http://veritas-vos-liberabit.com/tmp/2008/nunit24-mono.tar.bz2
> 
> If no problem, I'll checkin this new nunit24 directory and 
> build changes, without removing nunit20 for a while.
> 
> Atsushi Eno
> 
> > It is anything but negative approach. As I wrote earlier, I believe 
> > this is a mono bug that likely hits other projects and 
> should be fixed 
> > in mono land.
> > 
> > I'll try to cook a repro and file a bug.
> > 
> > For the record, there is almost no change in NUnit code in 
> my archive.
> > We just have to change AssemblyInfo (assembly key location), remove 
> > tests (they are extra in our source tree) and extra stuff 
> such as GUI.
> > It is straightforward upstream code. Believe or not, just 
> diff them ;)
> > 
> > Atsushi Eno
> > 
> > 
> > Charlie Poole wrote:
> >> I think a more positive approach would be to work with the NUnit 
> >> project so that you can just use the upstream code.
> >>
> >> Charlie
> >>
> >>> -----Original Message-----
> >>> From: mono-list-bounces at lists.ximian.com
> >>> [mailto:mono-list-bounces at lists.ximian.com] On Behalf Of 
> Atsushi Eno
> >>> Sent: Saturday, November 22, 2008 4:30 PM
> >>> To: mono-list at lists.ximian.com
> >>> Subject: SPAM-LOW: Re: [Mono-list] NUnit Version - Upgrade soon?
> >>>
> >>> You almost do not have to do that:
> >>> http://veritas-vos-liberabit.com/tmp/2008/nunit24-mono.tar.bz2
> >>>
> >>> It builds but does not work anyways right now, probably 
> because of 
> >>> some type resolution bugs between nunit-console.dll and 
> >>> nunit-console.exe.
> >>>
> >>> If you have patch for mono (diff in mono/mcs, not diff in
> >>> nunit) to fix any issues, that is welcome.
> >>>
> >>> Atsushi Eno
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Michael Franz wrote:
> >>>> OK,
> >>>>
> >>>> I thought I read somewhere that there were patches to NUnit
> >>> that were
> >>>> mono specific.
> >>>>
> >>>> Is it ok to submit patches to mono that depend on the
> >>> latest version
> >>>> of NUnit?
> >>>>
> >>>> Michael
> >>>>
> >>>> On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 3:25 PM, Miguel de Icaza 
> <miguel at novell.com 
> >>>> <mailto:miguel at novell.com>> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>     Hello,
> >>>>
> >>>>      > What changes to NUnit were specific to Mono?
> >>>>      >
> >>>>      > Is there a list of these features?
> >>>>
> >>>>     You are confused;   There are no changes, you should 
> >>> just not depend on
> >>>>     Mono's built-in and private copy of NUnit to write your
> >>> NUnit test
> >>>>     cases.
> >>>>
> >>>>     You should get the latest NUnit.
> >>>>
> >>>>      > On Sun, Nov 16, 2008 at 10:54 PM, Miguel de Icaza
> >>>>     <miguel at novell.com <mailto:miguel at novell.com>>
> >>>>      > wrote:
> >>>>      >         Hello,
> >>>>      >
> >>>>      >
> >>>>      >         > I use NUnit for work and have been using 
> >>> the latest version
> >>>>      >         for
> >>>>      >         > months.  I wrote some test for Mono and 
> >>> found out that the
> >>>>      >         version
> >>>>      >         > that Mono is using does not support some 
> >>> of the asserts
> >>>>     I am
> >>>>      >         using
> >>>>      >         > (IsEmpty).  Is there any plan to upgrade 
> >>> the version of
> >>>>      >         NUnit that is
> >>>>      >         > used with the Mono build/test?
> >>>>      >
> >>>>      >
> >>>>      >         The NUnit that ships with Mono should be 
> considered
> >>>>     Mono's own
> >>>>      >         copy of
> >>>>      >         NUnit and not a public version of it.
> >>>>      >
> >>>>      >         We should probably make packages of the 
> >>> latest version of
> >>>>      >         NUnit,
> >>>>      >         encourage the NUnit developer to maintain 
> >>> those and encourage
> >>>>      >         developers
> >>>>      >         to use the public NUnit as opposed to the 
> >>> private copy that
> >>>>      >         Mono ships.
> >>>>      >
> >>>>      >
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>> 
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>> --
> >>>> --
> >>>>
> >>>> _______________________________________________
> >>>> Mono-list maillist  -  Mono-list at lists.ximian.com 
> >>>> http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-list
> >>> _______________________________________________
> >>> Mono-list maillist  -  Mono-list at lists.ximian.com 
> >>> http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-list
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Mono-list maillist  -  Mono-list at lists.ximian.com 
> >> http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-list
> >>
> > 
> > _______________________________________________
> > Mono-list maillist  -  Mono-list at lists.ximian.com 
> > http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-list
> > 
> 
>