[Mono-dev] moonlight source in mono-2.0
fejj at novell.com
Mon Aug 18 20:28:13 EDT 2008
On Mon, 2008-08-18 at 20:10 -0400, Geoff Norton wrote:
> On Mon, 2008-08-18 at 19:58 -0400, Jeffrey Stedfast wrote:
> > Forgot to add that IMHO, ideally you should package (even if you don't
> > ship by default) the 2.1 assemblies (and smcs?) so that it is easier for
> > Fedora's end-users to get a working Moonlight should they choose to
> > install it.
> > W/o the 2.1 assemblies packaged, they would have to build their own
> > Mono.
> I'm fairly certain the plan here is for us to provide a .xpi that would
> run on a mono-less machine for SL2. In other words we're going to
> bundle the runtime bits we need in the .xpi.
Aha, then disregard my previous mail ;-)
More information about the Mono-devel-list