[Mono-dev] C bindings VS C++ bindings (Gtk# vs. Kimono?)

[Jonathan Pryor]

On Mon, 2007-10-15 at 19:42 +0100, James Mansion wrote:
> Jonathan Pryor wrote:
> > On Wed, 2007-09-26 at 20:37 +0100, James Mansion wrote:
> >   
> >> The use of GPL is very unfortunate - Qt does at least allow for MPL and 
> >> an extending range of other open source licences.  
> >
> > Uh, Qt is NOT compatible with MPL and an extended range of other open
> > source licenses.
>
> I disagree.
> 
> See http://trolltech.com/products/qt/gplexception and 
> http://trolltech.com/developer/notes/changes/changes-4.3.2/.

OK, I'll agree with your assessment that Qt is compatible with a wider
range of open-source licenses.

Now for my crucial question: where did you find that gplexception link?
It's certainly not mentioned at [0] or [1], and a cursory search can't
find any pages that link to the gplexception page.  It's as if you need
to know it's there to even find it...

At minimum, shouldn't they link to the gplexception page from their
licensing pages?

 - Jon

[0] http://trolltech.com/products/qt/licenses/licensing
[1] http://trolltech.com/products/qt/licenses/licensing/opensource