[Mono-dev] mod_mono, fast_cgi and configuration.

[Miguel de Icaza]

Hello Robert,

> I doubt FastCGI would be easier to configure.

[...]

> Configuring an application-to-mono-process mapping, easily
> to achieve with mod_mono, will become a nightmare with FastCGI.
> Moreover, the config snippets above must be inserted in
> every vhost, otherwise the vhosts will share the same
> mono-fastcgi-server process.

Thanks for this feedback, I was not aware that the configuration would
become more complicated.

Do you have some ideas on what we could do to make mod_mono simpler to
configure?  

And do people have some thoughts on what we could do to improve
mod_mono?  Which areas are particularly weak, and what can we do to
improve it?

Miguel.

> And since HttpResponse.TransmitFile won't be as efficient as it
> used to be under mod_mono (which simply passes the file name
> to apache), even more apache config voodoo is required (and that's
> the best case).
> 
> Robert
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Mono-devel-list mailing list
> Mono-devel-list at lists.ximian.com
> http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-devel-list