[Mono-dev] InterOp problems with 1.2.6pre2
Prakash Punnoor
prakash at punnoor.de
Sat Dec 1 03:01:50 EST 2007
On the day of Friday 30 November 2007 Andreas Färber hast written:
> Am 30.11.2007 um 22:10 schrieb Prakash Punnoor:
> > On the day of Friday 30 November 2007 Robert Jordan hast written:
> >> The layouts don't match, since declaring a field "private" won't
> >> magically subtract it from struct layout.
> >
> > It would help if you'd look at the svn version as I wrote in my
> > mail. Reading
> > helps, really....
>
> Careful there: You are writing to the development list of Mono and you
> seem to want help for a problem you are encountering with some third
> party library. So first of all, this is actually off-topic for this
> list in two aspects. To get help non-the-less, file a proper bug
> report with a self-contained test case, best place would be in
> Novell's Bugzilla with a link here. Pointing people to some SVN code
> they have to checkout and configure etc. is definitely not a self-
> contained test-case. And when you do provide code then it's your
> responsibility to make sure it's the correct code you're talking of,
> not Robert's.
>
> See: http://www.mono-project.com/Bugs
My time is limited. I could also simply ignore the bugs I encounter and try to
find work-arounds. It is not my duty to give you test-cases. You the mono
devs should see it as a courtesy that I report anything. It wouldn't take too
much time to simply reproduce it and with the knowledge mono devs have they
could pinpoint it faster then I have done it by wildly guessing. And in fact
my report was pretty concise. I wrote down everything you need to know to
reproduce that bug.
I don't need your help. I report a bug in mono, so I help you to make your
product better!
I compare it with Linux kernel mailing list: There the devs respect the users
and at least react to mails. The least I expected was a reaction and perhaps
a hint what the posted error means so I could perhaps provide a small
testcase within 5 minutes.
In another post, I tried to contibute a small optimizing patch for
UInt32.Parse. Did I get any reaction whatsoever? Did I?
So moral of the story: I won't waste my time anymore on the mono mailing list.
If you want people contributing - be it with code or bug reports - no matter
whether the way of postig fits your taste or not - learn to respect that the
contributers actually sacrifices some time for mono.
Good luck!
--
(°= =°)
//\ Prakash Punnoor /\\
V_/ \_V
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
Url : http://lists.ximian.com/pipermail/mono-devel-list/attachments/20071201/fa892f5c/attachment.bin
More information about the Mono-devel-list
mailing list