[Mono-dev] [PATCH] ActiveDirectoryMembershipProvider

[Miguel de Icaza]

Hello,

> The class would be slightly more useful in the above scenario. Probably 
> this circumvents some policy about MonoTODOs, but again just want to 
> post this info somewhere for others to google. It might even improve 
> things just by calling base.Initialize and then throwing, as you could 
> catch that exception and still be in business. Thoughts?

Your patch looks correct, and since the MonoTODO is kept there, it will
be useful as a reference to others in the future.

Miguel.