[Mono-dev] Mono 1.2 or 1.somethingelse?

"Andrés G. Aragoneses [ knocte ] "Andrés G. Aragoneses [ knocte ]
Wed Oct 4 11:00:02 EDT 2006

Michael Schurter escribió:
> Miguel de Icaza wrote:
>>     I would even go as far as saying that we could feel confident that
>> this could be called "Mono 2.0", but 2.0 would have the unfortunate
>> effect of confusing people regarding our .net 2.0 support.  
> Agreed!

I also agree.

>>     So am thinking that maybe we could call this "Mono 1.5", or if we
>> plan on keeping the even/odd release numbers from the kernel that we
>> could call this Mono 1.6 or 1.8
>>     Opinions?
> 1.2 seems fine to me.  I don't think people really care as long as new 
> release number > old release number.  Skipping version numbers may make 
> developers feel better, but it leaves users scratching their heads about 
> where 1.2-1.4 went.
> Also, 1.5 could be interpreted to mean halfway to .NET 2.0, which is in 
> no way accurate.

I agree with Michael. BTW, can we measure approximately, in a 
percentage, the current implementation of the 2.0 profile?


	Andrés	[ knocte ]


More information about the Mono-devel-list mailing list