[Mono-dev] Mono 1.2 or 1.somethingelse?
mhinks at gmail.com
Wed Oct 4 09:01:15 EDT 2006
I'd agree that calling it 2.0 would confuse the issue with .net 2.0 support....
My (unimportant) 2 cents ;p
On 10/4/06, Miguel de Icaza <miguel at ximian.com> wrote:
> We have always been thinking that the next release of Mono would be
> "1.2" which would flag an incremental update to Mono 1.0, but this is a
> relatively large update as it contains a lot of functionality that was
> not in Mono 1.0.
> I would even go as far as saying that we could feel confident that
> this could be called "Mono 2.0", but 2.0 would have the unfortunate
> effect of confusing people regarding our .net 2.0 support.
> So am thinking that maybe we could call this "Mono 1.5", or if we
> plan on keeping the even/odd release numbers from the kernel that we
> could call this Mono 1.6 or 1.8
> Mono-devel-list mailing list
> Mono-devel-list at lists.ximian.com
More information about the Mono-devel-list