[Mono-dev] Re: Ambiguous matching in method resolution

[pablosantosluac at terra.es]

Hi,

No, every interface is implemented by a different class.

Do you think is better to rename all the methods or wait for a solution?

pablo

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Eyal Alaluf" <eyala at mainsoft.com>
To: <pablosantosluac at terra.es>
Cc: <mono-devel-list at lists.ximian.com>; "Robert Jordan" <robertj at gmx.net>
Sent: Thursday, June 01, 2006 11:37 AM
Subject: Re: [Mono-dev] Re: Ambiguous matching in method resolution


> Hi.
>
> Are the interfaces implemented by the same class? This could explain quite 
> a bit, actually.
>
> Eyal.
>
> On Thu, 1 Jun 2006 pablosantosluac at terra.es wrote:
>
>> Date: Thu, 1 Jun 2006 10:33:19 +0200
>> From: pablosantosluac at terra.es
>> To: mono-devel-list at lists.ximian.com, Robert Jordan <robertj at gmx.net>
>> Subject: Re: [Mono-dev] Re: Ambiguous matching in method resolution
>>
>> Well, the funny thing is that the problems I detected are between methods
>> in... different interfaces!!
>>
>>
>> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Robert Jordan" <robertj at gmx.net>
>> To: <mono-devel-list at lists.ximian.com>
>> Sent: Thursday, June 01, 2006 9:33 AM
>> Subject: [Mono-dev] Re: Ambiguous matching in method resolution
>>
>>
>>> Ympostor wrote:
>>>> pablosantosluac at terra.es escribió:
>>>>> And more info yet.
>>>>>
>>>>> The methods that seem to have trouble are the following:
>>>>>
>>>>> - The server is "publishing" several interfaces under different
>>>>> "service names" by remoting.
>>>>>
>>>>> - There are methods with the same name and different signatures on
>>>>> different interfaces.
>>>>>
>>>>> - These methods are the ones causing trouble (not even overloaded
>>>>> methods on the same interface, but methods with the same name on
>>>>> different ones)
>>>>
>>>> Just wondering... I have also experimented this exception when using
>>>> Remoting and methods with the same name (overloaded). Have you tested
>>>> the scenario Windows+MS.NET vs Windows+MS.NET? If yes and it works, the
>>>> objective is to find a small testcase where the behaviour differs from
>>>> one runtime to another.
>>>
>>> It looks like this bug:
>>>
>>> http://bugzilla.ximian.com/show_bug.cgi?id=77191
>>>
>>> Robert
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Mono-devel-list mailing list
>>> Mono-devel-list at lists.ximian.com
>>> http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-devel-list
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Mono-devel-list mailing list
>> Mono-devel-list at lists.ximian.com
>> http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-devel-list
>>