[Mono-dev] The State Of Mono Assembly Verification?

Sebastien Pouliot sebastien.pouliot at gmail.com
Fri Feb 3 08:14:58 EST 2006

On Fri, 2006-02-03 at 11:34 +0100, Jb Evain wrote:
> On Feb 3, 2006, at 11:29 AM, Paolo Molaro wrote:
> > We need to investigate if it's better to change ilasm to produce
> > the incorrect assemblies (when given a specific command
> > line option) or write a specific front-end to PEAPI
> > or Cecil that can be used to create broken assemblies.
> I don't know much about PEAPI, but Cecil does basically no  
> verification and is a good candidate to emit broken assemblies.

Interesting - considering that both cases have their uses. Is it by
design ? 

I.e. will it be true in one/2/3... years or do you (or someone else ;-)
plan to contributes (some of) the checks ? and if so do you plan to
ensure they are always optional?
Sebastien Pouliot <sebastien.pouliot at gmail.com>

More information about the Mono-devel-list mailing list