[Mono-dev] system class

[Kornél Pál]

If you can make them understand the power behing open source I think they
will let it released.:)

Open source is good for them as well, as currently they have a version. They
paid for it. But unless they pay for it again and again it's bugs won't be
fixed and it will be outdated after some time.

But if they release it as open source other people can fix and imporve it
(in other words maintain it), and they will benefit this as well.

And of course we could use it.:)

Kornél

----- Original Message -----
From: "Matthijs ter Woord" <matthijsterwoord at gmail.com>
To: "Will Weisser" <wweisser at cambia.com>; <mono-devel-list at lists.ximian.com>
Sent: Thursday, October 06, 2005 5:07 PM
Subject: Re: [Mono-dev] system class


> Well, you could always ask your employer :-)
>
>
> Greets,
>
> Matthijs ter Woord
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Will Weisser" <wweisser at cambia.com>
> To: <mono-devel-list at lists.ximian.com>
> Sent: Wednesday, October 05, 2005 7:20 PM
> Subject: RE: [Mono-dev] system class
>
>
> As I understand it the main difficulty in dealing with Microsoft's WMI
> implementation is that it runs over DCOM and not a standard protocol
> such as HTTP.
>
> I wrote a C# DCOM stack and WMI implementation for my company, but since
> they own it and not me I can't release it into the Mono class libs.
>
> -W.W.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: mono-devel-list-bounces at lists.ximian.com
> [mailto:mono-devel-list-bounces at lists.ximian.com] On Behalf Of Matthijs
> ter Woord
> Sent: Wednesday, October 05, 2005 1:00 PM
> To: Rafael Ferreira
> Cc: Robert Jordan; mono-devel-list at lists.ximian.com
> Subject: Re: [Mono-dev] system class
>
> Hmm, how about OpenWBEM? WMI is supposed to be an implementation of the
> WBEM
> standard, OpenWBEM too.
>
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Rafael Ferreira" <lists at ophion.org>
> To: "Matthijs ter Woord" <matthijsterwoord at gmail.com>
> Cc: <mono-devel-list at lists.ximian.com>; "Robert Jordan"
> <robertj at gmx.net>
> Sent: Wednesday, October 05, 2005 6:11 PM
> Subject: Re: [Mono-dev] system class
>
>
>> yeah its called snmpd :-)
>>
>> On Wed, 2005-10-05 at 16:10 +0200, Matthijs ter Woord wrote:
>> > OK, i agree, but i actually mean a software package which provides
> roughly
>> > the same functionality.
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > ----- Original Message -----
>> > From: "Robert Jordan" <robertj at gmx.net>
>> > To: <mono-devel-list at lists.ximian.com>
>> > Sent: Wednesday, October 05, 2005 3:59 PM
>> > Subject: Re: [Mono-dev] system class
>> >
>> >
>> > > Matthijs ter Woord wrote:
>> > > > Are there any WMI alternatives on linux (opensource/closed
> source)?
>> > >
>> > > An implementation of the "Windows Management Instrumentation"
>> > > for Linux? :-)
>> > >
>> > > Rob
>> > >
>> > > _______________________________________________
>> > > Mono-devel-list mailing list
>> > > Mono-devel-list at lists.ximian.com
>> > > http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-devel-list
>> >
>> >
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > Mono-devel-list mailing list
>> > Mono-devel-list at lists.ximian.com
>> > http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-devel-list
>> >
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Mono-devel-list mailing list
> Mono-devel-list at lists.ximian.com
> http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-devel-list
> _______________________________________________
> Mono-devel-list mailing list
> Mono-devel-list at lists.ximian.com
> http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-devel-list
>
> _______________________________________________
> Mono-devel-list mailing list
> Mono-devel-list at lists.ximian.com
> http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-devel-list
>