[Mono-dev] [PATCH] fix for 64bit architectures, lib linker
Zoltan Varga
vargaz at gmail.com
Sun Oct 2 17:15:26 EDT 2005
Hi,
I still don't really understand this. For example, this line in the
patch seems
completely unneccesary:
libmono_la_LIBADD = \
- $(libs)
+ $(libs) $(GLIB_LIBS) $(GMODULE_LIBS) -ldl
Since $(libs) already contains $(GLIB_LIBS) and $(GMODULE_LIBS), and
$(GMODULE_LIBS) contains -ldl.
Also, how should I check whenever the current mono sources have this 'bug' ?
Zoltan
On 10/2/05, Mirco Bauer <meebey at meebey.net> wrote:
> On Sun, 2005-10-02 at 22:07 +0200, Zoltan Varga wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > [1] was already in SVN, I checked in [2], but why is [3] required ?
>
> This bugreport we had in the Debian BTS [0] explains it.
> I am not sure though if that still applies to Mono 1.1.9.1
>
> [0] http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=262023;archive=yes
>
> --
> Regards,
>
> Mirco 'meebey' Bauer
>
> PGP-Key:
> http://keyserver.noreply.org/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xEEF946C8
>
> -----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK-----
> Version: 3.12
> GIT d s-:+ a-- C++ UL++++$ P L++$>+++$ E- W+++$ N o? K- w++>! O---- M-
> V? PS
> PE+ Y- PGP++ t 5+ X++ R tv+ b+ DI? D+ G>++ e h! r->++ y?
> ------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------
>
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux)
>
> iQEVAwUAQ0A/wnEn5avu+UbIAQJNlgf/fLfc0epV0UGdMWfZ8/dNHvs6Y765X+Ki
> BiHqGJH8qLRRWCdq0nsMDKVkF+o024+lEKulwvBDh1mzV5123hMRYdu90LFnVopQ
> NZS+kCCS7sp78dnu2NEXj6MoHqWp0eUqtUAFUI6OI4Z2TPY7kvfB7Jcb+TqPCuoy
> d5aphFhnGh6ZsacOlVOHXVVwgFivTiLGWXFbbbOfqGFBCHBE3gmaOYljoUPrsVpO
> fTJbNQbzaTG6kPnwvuVZ61KuugEjiFnDv0J/mZg6QOrimrisUZKibH01XEMcgere
> V68N6W+cYgvTZ+ubLoiFgn37zY2oRCAamCWl9Ab7R27HWtHb2ivLig==
> =yamV
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
>
>
More information about the Mono-devel-list
mailing list