[Mono-devel-list] [Patch] Another patch forRuntime.InteropServicesin corlib

[Sébastien Pouliot]

Hello Andreas,

> although they are no serious "issues", I'd still call them this 
> way, because 
> not having this interfaces and attributes might very well break code 
> (although it's not very likely)

Let's call that a "very unlikely interoperability issue" ;-)
 
> > See: http://www.mono-project.com/Coding_Guidelines#Examples
> 
> I read the Coding Guidelines Textfile in svn quite some times and 
> there is no rule as to how to format a namespace.

Not in the text, but the example (see the URL) is formatted this way.

> Maybe we should add it there.

Agreed.

> Actually in this case i didn't reformat the lines, but instead 
> replaced the entire headers, so at least these interface files 
> are consistent.

The main point (which wasn't specific to your patch) was not to change
the sources unless it's required (reviewing smaller patches is faster).

Sebastien Pouliot
home: spouliot at videotron.ca
blog: http://pages.infinit.net/ctech/poupou.html