[Mono-devel-list] Re: valid-sa-100 testcase

[Eyal Alaluf]

Hi, Atsushi.

> >> ... There are some cases
> >> that (at least) XmlTextReader.Read() and XmlDocument.Load() differ
> >> in rejecting input xml or not e.g. XmlDocument.Load() rejects
> >> undeclared entities while XmlTextReader does not.
I ment this difference that you have mentioned.

Eyal.

On Mon, 20 Jun 2005, Atsushi Eno wrote:

> Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2005 03:07:44 +0900
> From: Atsushi Eno <atsushi at ximian.com>
> To: Eyal Alaluf <eyala at mainsoft.com>
> Cc: Andrew Skiba <andrews at mainsoft.com>,
>      mono-devel mailing list <mono-devel-list at lists.ximian.com>
> Subject: Re: [Mono-devel-list] Re: valid-sa-100 testcase
>
> Hi Eyal,
>
> Am not sure if I correctly understand your question (because I have
> no idea how this Q is related to the topic and my answer). But maybe
> I should answer "it depends" on the "difference".
>
> Atsushi Eno
>
> Eyal Alaluf wrote:
> > Hi, Atsushi.
> >
> > Would the use of a validating reader around XmlTextReader explain the
> > difference between the XmlDocument.Load and XmlTextReader?
> >
> > Eyal.
> >
> > On Sat, 18 Jun 2005, Atsushi Eno wrote:
> >
> >> Date: Sat, 18 Jun 2005 01:04:18 +0900
> >> From: Atsushi Eno <atsushi at ximian.com>
> >> To: Eyal Alaluf <eyala at mainsoft.com>
> >> Cc: Andrew Skiba <andrews at mainsoft.com>,
> >>      mono-devel mailing list <mono-devel-list at lists.ximian.com>
> >> Subject: Re: [Mono-devel-list] Re: valid-sa-100 testcase
> >>
> >> Hi Eyal,
> >>
> >>> Just to set things straight. The patch was rejected since it was incomplete
> >>> caused regressions and you didn't like the approach. The lack of concrete
> >>> test case at the time that motivated the patch prevented us from continuing
> >>> the discussion at that time. Now that the lost test was found :-) we are
> >>> continuing the discussion.
> >> That is also true to me that I am not motivated for that problem.
> >> MS.NET is not also doing well on entity processing and I found no
> >> serious existing solutions, so I just kept away from it.
> >>
> >>> Now back to the test, how do you propose to fix the issue? What is your
> >>> analysis of the issue?
> >> Honestly, entity handling stuff is so minor that even MS.NET does
> >> not work fine (for example RDF DTD that Joshua posted could not
> >> be read fine), so am not fixing it soon. But of course I'd
> >> appreciate if you guys or anyone would fix the problem :-)
> >>
> >>> Regarding XmlDocument use, how do you think we should test it?
> >>  > When you changed xmltest.cs did you have cases where XmlDocument
> >>  > didn't work in Mono but worked in MS?
> >>
> >> I don't remember even whether I was aware of such differences or not.
> >> I was not always paying attention to MS.NET behavior (since there
> >> are many tests that .NET does not work fine). There are some cases
> >> that (at least) XmlTextReader.Read() and XmlDocument.Load() differ
> >> in rejecting input xml or not e.g. XmlDocument.Load() rejects
> >> undeclared entities while XmlTextReader does not.
> >>
> >> Atsushi Eno
> >>
> >
> >
>
>