[Mono-dev] Mono runtime segfault
David Carr
dc at dcarr.org
Tue Aug 23 09:33:01 EDT 2005
Feelite et at,
Thanks for the help with my problem. Looks like I have a bit more
learning to do...
Should I file a bug report indicating that a StackOverflowException
should be thrown in this situation?
Thanks for your time,
David Carr
feelite qiu wrote:
> hi David
>
> the code snippet
>
> int var
> {
> get { return var; }
> set { var = value; }
> }
>
>
> creates an infinite loop as properties are internally implemented as
> methods. So when you instantiate the object,
>
> Crash c = new Crash(10);
>
> This chain of action is what I understand
>
> new Crash(10) -> var = 10; -> set { var = 10; } -> get { return var;
> } -> get { return var; } ->...
>
> the error lies in the fact that your property var does not refer to an
> underlying field. You can try
>
> int Var;
> int var
> {
> get { return Var; }
> set { Var = value; }
> }
>
>
> regards
> feelite
>
> On 8/23/05, *David Carr* <dc at dcarr.org <mailto:dc at dcarr.org>> wrote:
>
> I'm getting an unexpected segfault running the code below: Forgive me
> if its a silly mistake on my part.
>
> Thanks for any help,
> David Carr
>
> david at Cadmium ~/Prog/c#/gcross $ mono Crash.exe
> Segmentation fault
>
> Listing for Crash.cs:
> public class Crash
> {
> int var
> {
> get { return var; }
> set { var = value; }
> }
>
> public Crash(int i)
> {
> var = i;
> }
>
> public static void Main()
> {
> Crash c = new Crash(10);
> }
>
> }
>
> mono --version
> Mono JIT compiler version 1.1.8.3 <http://1.1.8.3>, (C) 2002-2005
> Novell, Inc and
> Contributors. www.mono-project.com <http://www.mono-project.com>
> TLS: __thread
> GC: Included Boehm (with typed GC)
> SIGSEGV : normal
> Globalization: normal
>
> compiled from source with:
> gcc --version
> gcc (GCC) 3.3.5-20050130 (Gentoo Linux 3.3.5.20050130-r1,
> ssp-3.3.5.20050130-1 , pie-8.7.7.1)
> Copyright (C) 2003 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
> This is free software; see the source for copying
> conditions. There is NO
> warranty; not even for MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR
> PURPOSE.
> _______________________________________________
> Mono-devel-list mailing list
> Mono-devel-list at lists.ximian.com
> <mailto:Mono-devel-list at lists.ximian.com>
> http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-devel-list
>
>
>------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>_______________________________________________
>Mono-devel-list mailing list
>Mono-devel-list at lists.ximian.com
>http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-devel-list
>
>
More information about the Mono-devel-list
mailing list