[Mono-dev] Please revert your changes.

[Pascal Fresnay]

Miguel de Icaza a écrit :

>Hello,
>
>  
>
>>Your code does not print anything at all that may be the reason you see
>>nothing.
>>
>>typeof(_CustomAttributeBuilder) may fail because you did not import
>>System.Runtime.InteropServices as Jeroen Frijters has written before me.
>>    
>>
>
>As I said last night, the issue was that I posted the wrong sample, here
>is the correct sample:
>
>using System;
>using System.Reflection.Emit;
>
>class X {
>	static void Main ()
>	{
>		// The following line does not build
>		//Type j = typeof (System.Runtime.InteropServices._CustomAttributeBuilder);
>		
>		Type t = typeof (CustomAttributeBuilder);
>
>		foreach (Type i in t.GetInterfaces ()){
>			Console.WriteLine ("Interface: " + i);
>		}
>	}
>}
>
>This sample displays nothing when compiled on my system which has:
>
>	.NET 1.1 SP1
>	.NET SDK 1.1
>
>
>  
>
it seems that there is various .NET 1.1 SP1 :)
First, I think that .NET SDK is not necessary, csc.exe is included in 
redistribuable package.
What is your mscorlib version number ?
on my config :
$ /cygdrive/c/WINNT/Microsoft.NET/Framework/v1.1.4322/gacutil.exe -l 
mscorlib

Microsoft (R) .NET Global Assembly Cache Utility.  Version 1.1.4318.0
Copyright (C) Microsoft Corporation 1998-2002. All rights reserved.

The Global Assembly Cache contains the following assemblies:

The cache of ngen files contains the following entries:
        mscorlib, Version=1.0.5000.0, Culture=neutral, 
PublicKeyToken=b77a5c5619
34e089, 
Custom=5a00410050002d004e0035002e0030002d0038004600440053002d00300030003
000310043003200330032000000
        mscorlib, Version=1.0.5000.0, Culture=neutral, 
PublicKeyToken=b77a5c5619
34e089, 
Custom=5a00410050002d004e0035002e0030002d003800460053002d003100300031003
80046003700390037000000

Number of items = 2

>>BTW please read my previous (long) message that begins with some explanation
>>about RTM in this thread as it contains a lot of information and my opinion
>>about SP1 extensions.
>>    
>>
>
>I have read it, but am still debating whether we should follow or not.
>
>Having a new interface is not terrible compared to having a new base
>class.
>
>Miguel
>_______________________________________________
>Mono-devel-list mailing list
>Mono-devel-list at lists.ximian.com
>http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-devel-list
>
>
>  
>