[Mono-devel-list] RE: [Mono-list] LANDED: managedcollation (CompareInfo) support

[Rafael Mizrahi]

Ok, I understand.
I should have written managed "ICU" ;)
I understand that this is a new mono implementation of collation for
globalization features.

So, mono will abandon icu4c, somewhere in the nearest future?

rafi

-----Original Message-----
From: Atsushi Eno [mailto:atsushi at ximian.com] 
Sent: Monday, August 08, 2005 2:45 PM
To: Rafael Mizrahi
Cc: Ilya Kharmatsky; mono-devel mailing list
Subject: Re: [Mono-devel-list] RE: [Mono-list] LANDED: managedcollation
(CompareInfo) support

No, no, I mean, old icu4c stuff ;-)

Atsushi Eno

Rafael Mizrahi wrote:
> Atsushi,
> WOW, managed ICU, 
> Does this mean that, soon, mono will stop using the native ICU
> implementation ?
> 
> rafi
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: mono-devel-list-bounces at lists.ximian.com
> [mailto:mono-devel-list-bounces at lists.ximian.com] On Behalf Of Atsushi
> Eno
> Sent: Monday, August 08, 2005 12:05 PM
> To: Ilya Kharmatsky
> Cc: mono-list mailing list; mono-devel mailing list
> Subject: Re: [Mono-devel-list] RE: [Mono-list] LANDED:
managedcollation
> (CompareInfo) support
> 
> Hi Ilya,
> 
> 
>>Great news! Thank you!
> 
> 
> Thank you too, for all your help on it :-)
> 
> 
>>Are you planning to make some performance banchmarks and compare
> 
> results
> 
>>to 
>>"old" and may be MS.Net performance results?
> 
> 
> Am not planning to measure comparison results between MS.NET and Mono,
> but the attached example will show you the fact (to run it you will
> have to create "sample.txt" where any content should be OK). It is
> what I used to measure performance improvements on optimizing my code.
> 
> But it is good idea to measure comparison between ICU based code and
> managed collation. I'll post a followup if I managed to get
> icu-based code working (it is disabled now and am not sure if the
> latest code works fine).
> 
> Atsushi Eno
> 
>