[Mono-devel-list] un-interoperatible classes .NET -> Monoremoting
dezelin32 at fastmail.fm
Thu Sep 30 07:55:12 EDT 2004
Jason King wrote:
>Therefore, by looking at Mono source code (hey, its open source, you
>could even change YOUR version to suit you / your remoting client) and
>using the marvellous Reflector on Windows platforms, you would be able
>to see where the hash table etc classes differ, and thus only wrap up
>those that need it.
>I would be surprised if you would have to convert string to char arrays
>(I will take a risk: you don't need to!).
What you wanted to say is that primitive types are written to be
interoperable. Is their implementation defined by standard?
More information about the Mono-devel-list