[Mono-devel-list] Corlib test cases

yoros at wanadoo.es yoros at wanadoo.es
Sun Jan 25 17:30:27 EST 2004

On Sat, Jan 24, 2004 at 09:09:14AM +0000, David Sheldon wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 24, 2004 at 08:55:29AM +0000, David Sheldon wrote:
> > On Fri, Jan 23, 2004 at 08:14:02PM +0900, Nick Drochak wrote:
> > > I started a kind of convention before where I'd enter a bug and then put an
> > > [Ignore] on that test with a comment with the bug number in it.  
> > I might well go for continuing along that line,
> Just a quick thought having had a look at this, often a single
> test-method will test several things, say formatting lots of strings. If
> we Ignore this test, we could introduce bugs in the other tests. Hmm,
> though having said that, having a failing test stops all the tests after
> it in that method from running anyway. Comments?

I think that unit tests are designed to have only one test for method
but we have a lot of ones... (it could be good to use try-catch...



Pedro Martínez Juliá
\  yoros at terra.es
)|    yoros at wanadoo.es
/        http://yoros.dyndns.org
Socio HispaLinux #311
Usuario Linux #275438 - http://counter.li.org
GnuPG public information:  pub  1024D/74F1D3AC
Key fingerprint = 8431 7B47 D2B4 5A46 5F8E  534F 588B E285 74F1 D3AC

More information about the Mono-devel-list mailing list