[Mono-devel-list] Bug in mini
piersh at friskit.com
Sun May 4 07:34:02 EDT 2003
> But I would like some
> sort of official response from the spec people, because, I
> hope we can agree that if the spec is meant to allow that
> sort of code, it is at least poorly worded.
Yup, after reading the spec again I have to agree with you. The wording
is wrong. The whole passage about 'location X' having an empty stack
would be redundant if X wasn't at the start of a basic block that could
be found by depth-first traversal.
More information about the Mono-devel-list