[Mono-bugs] [Bug 669210] New: Thread.Abort() and Thread.Join() don't work properly.

bugzilla_noreply at novell.com bugzilla_noreply at novell.com
Thu Feb 3 09:48:34 EST 2011


https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=669210

https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=669210#c0


           Summary: Thread.Abort() and Thread.Join() don't work properly.
    Classification: Mono
           Product: Mono: Compilers
           Version: 2.6.x
          Platform: x86
        OS/Version: Windows XP
            Status: NEW
          Severity: Normal
          Priority: P5 - None
         Component: C#
        AssignedTo: msafar at novell.com
        ReportedBy: kobi2187 at gmail.com
         QAContact: mono-bugs at lists.ximian.com
          Found By: ---
           Blocker: ---


User-Agent:       Opera/9.80 (Windows NT 5.1; U; en) Presto/2.7.62
Version/11.01

a thread receiving Abort request seems to ignore it under Mono.
Even though the thread state changes, it doesn't exit.
However, under .net compiler, it exits after a short while.
maybe it isn't implemented yet?
This is in windows xp, mono 2.6 beta

Reproducible: Always

Steps to Reproduce:
generate an RSA key, with something large, for example 6000 bits.
run it from thread (renderjob).
>From the calling function, set a timeout of 5 seconds -  renderjob.Join(5000);
after that statement, add renderjob.Abort()
Actual Results:  
thread should exit.

Expected Results:  
thread ignores(?) the requested abort.

I compared .net compilation with mono.
Microsoft's compiler indeed stopped a short while later, while mono didn't,
the thread was stuck in "Background, AbortRequested" thread state.

found in mono 2.6 beta 1.
This happens in WindowsXP.

I can reproduce it. if the example isn't clear enough, I'll send short code.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.


More information about the mono-bugs mailing list