[Mono-bugs] [Bug 608195] Enumerable.Reverse should be lazier

bugzilla_noreply at novell.com bugzilla_noreply at novell.com
Mon May 24 10:47:21 EDT 2010



--- Comment #4 from Jb Evain <jbevain at novell.com> 2010-05-24 14:47:20 UTC ---
Jonathan, it's indeed not a significant change, but the bug is clear and is
well named. Reverse should be lazier. As simple as that.

It's not about avoiding the allocation of the list to be reversed. It's just
about delaying the allocation, as it's the expected behavior for LINQ to
Objects operations.

I'll commit a slightly modified version of this patch tomorrow.

Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.

More information about the mono-bugs mailing list