[Mono-bugs] [Bug 652522] Parallel.For is 100 times slower than sequential for, at the same time Parallel.For with Partitioner is ok

[bugzilla_noreply at novell.com]

https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=652522

https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=652522#c4


Jérémie LAVAL <jeremie.laval at gmail.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |FIXED

--- Comment #4 from Jérémie LAVAL <jeremie.laval at gmail.com> 2010-12-02 10:21:32 UTC ---
I'll continue working on PLinq speed optimizations but as for the initial bug
itself I'm closing it.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.