[Mono-bugs] [Bug 483462] New: Bad code gen of OP_LOADI4_MEMINDEX for PPC64
bugzilla_noreply at novell.com
bugzilla_noreply at novell.com
Mon Mar 9 11:14:46 EDT 2009
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483462
Summary: Bad code gen of OP_LOADI4_MEMINDEX for PPC64
Classification: Mono
Product: Mono: Runtime
Version: 2.4.x
Platform: PowerPC-64
OS/Version: openSUSE 10.3
Status: NEW
Severity: Normal
Priority: P5 - None
Component: JIT
AssignedTo: lupus at novell.com
ReportedBy: munroesj at us.ibm.com
QAContact: mono-bugs at lists.ximian.com
Found By: ---
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux ppc64; en-US; rv:1.8.1.19)
Gecko/20081213 SUSE/2.0.0.19-0.3 Firefox/2.0.0.19
Looking at the handling for indexed loads of integers I see the following:
case OP_LOADI4_MEMINDEX:
case OP_LOADU4_MEMINDEX:
ppc_lwzx (code, ins->dreg, ins->sreg2, ins->inst_basereg);
#ifdef __mono_ppc64__
if (ins->opcode == OP_LOADI4_MEMINDEX)
ppc_extsb (code, ins->dreg, ins->dreg);
#endif
break;
This is obviously wrong it also has the bad side effect of generating a code
size assert because the cpu-ppc64.md specifies a length of 4:
loadi4_memindex: dest:i src1:b src2:i len:4
Reproducible: Couldn't Reproduce
Steps to Reproduce:
1.
2.
3.
Actual Results:
Got a size assert once in association with a new set of optimizations.
Should use load word arithmetic index for loadi4_memindex in PPC64
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.
More information about the mono-bugs
mailing list