[Mono-bugs] [Bug 81280][Nor] New - RangeValidator should use inclusive range [w/ fix]

bugzilla-daemon at bugzilla.ximian.com bugzilla-daemon at bugzilla.ximian.com
Sat Mar 31 18:18:38 EDT 2007

Please do not reply to this email- if you want to comment on the bug, go to the
URL shown below and enter your comments there.

Changed by mmorano at mikeandwan.us.


--- shadow/81280	2007-03-31 17:18:38.000000000 -0500
+++ shadow/81280.tmp.25339	2007-03-31 17:18:38.000000000 -0500
@@ -0,0 +1,45 @@
+Bug#: 81280
+Product: Mono: Class Libraries
+Version: 1.2
+OS Details: 
+Status: NEW   
+Priority: Normal
+Component: Sys.Web
+AssignedTo: mhabersack at novell.com                            
+ReportedBy: mmorano at mikeandwan.us               
+QAContact: mono-bugs at ximian.com
+TargetMilestone: ---
+Summary: RangeValidator should use inclusive range [w/ fix]
+When using a RangeValidator, you are to specify the min and max values for
+a  rage.  For example, you should be able to specify a range from 1 to 100,
+which would allow any value between 1 and 100 including the endpoints. 
+However in mono's asp.net 2.0, this does not allow the endpoints.
+The error appears to be in the test within the WebValidation js file for
+2.0 applications.  The patch listed below also seems to be how it is coded
+for the 1.x version of this js file, so not sure why this became different
+from the 1.x version.
+Here is the diff:
+Index: WebUIValidation_2.0.js
+--- WebUIValidation_2.0.js      (revision 75238)
++++ WebUIValidation_2.0.js      (working copy)
+@@ -439,7 +439,7 @@
+        var MinimumValue = Convert (validator.getAttribute
+("minimumvalue"), DataType, validator);
+        var MaximumValue = Convert (validator.getAttribute
+("maximumvalue"), DataType, validator);
+        var val = Convert (ctrl_value, DataType, validator);
+-       if (val == null || val <= MinimumValue || val >= MaximumValue) {
++       if (val == null || val < MinimumValue || val > MaximumValue) {
+                ValidatorFailed (validator);
+                return false;
+        }

More information about the mono-bugs mailing list