[Mono-bugs] [Bug 81857][Nor] Changed - BigInteger reduction can fail on small values

[bugzilla-daemon at bugzilla.ximian.com]

Please do not reply to this email- if you want to comment on the bug, go to the
URL shown below and enter your comments there.

Changed by sebastien at ximian.com.

http://bugzilla.ximian.com/show_bug.cgi?id=81857

--- shadow/81857	2007-07-05 11:09:04.000000000 -0400
+++ shadow/81857.tmp.2734	2007-07-05 11:52:31.000000000 -0400
@@ -144,6 +144,13 @@
 			Assert.AreEqual (expected, manual, "b * b % mod");
 // fails (inside Barrett reduction)
 //			BigInteger actual = b.ModPow (exp, mod);
 //			Assert.AreEqual (expected, actual, "b.ModPow (exp, mod)");
 		}
 
+
+------- Additional Comments From sebastien at ximian.com  2007-07-05 11:52 -------
+Changed my workaround for one that makes more sense (i.e. that I'll
+keep even when the bug is fixed). SVN r81398-9 will select the best
+algorithm (SPP or RM) to check primality. This works around the
+current bug and also fix the 65537 corner case (as no random value is
+required).