[Mono-bugs] [Bug 80892][Maj] Changed - Monitor.Pulse not working properly on s390x

[bugzilla-daemon at bugzilla.ximian.com]

Please do not reply to this email- if you want to comment on the bug, go to the
URL shown below and enter your comments there.

Changed by wberrier at novell.com.

http://bugzilla.ximian.com/show_bug.cgi?id=80892

--- shadow/80892	2007-02-27 14:21:31.000000000 -0500
+++ shadow/80892.tmp.3539	2007-02-27 21:42:42.000000000 -0500
@@ -151,6 +151,32 @@
 ------- Additional Comments From lupus at ximian.com  2007-02-27 14:21 -------
 Uhm, the asm code may not be wrong if the cs instruction itself stores
 the old value in the first register (I have no good s390 asm docs), 
 the code looks more complex than needed, since a single cs instruction
 would work, instead of using an LA/LR pair before it.
 
+
+------- Additional Comments From wberrier at novell.com  2007-02-27 21:42 -------
+Ran some tests today:
+
+I built 1.2.2 on the osdl sles9 machine from the suse src.rpm and was
+unable to reproduce this on the osdl s390x machine.  These rpms
+couldn't reproduce the error on s390z06.suse.de as well.
+
+I built the suse mono 1.2.2 on s390z06 in an sles10-sp and was able to
+reproduce.
+
+built same suse src.rpm on sles9 s390x on autobuild machine and was
+unable to reproduce.
+
+built suse src.rpm on x86_64 sles10-sp: unable to reproduce
+
+build on autobuild sles10-sp with sigaltstack=no: was able to reproduce
+
+Tried go-mono.com's 1.2.3.1 on s390x in autobuild: unable to reproduce.
+
+
+Tried go-mono.com's 1.2.2.1 on s390x in autobuild: unable to reproduce.
+
+I'll try building 1.2.3.1 in autobuild s390x and post results.
+
+I'll also try go-mono.com's 1.2.2 in the sle10-sp jail.