[Mono-bugs] [Bug 79434][Min] Changed - [PATCH] Order of members does not match MS

bugzilla-daemon at bugzilla.ximian.com bugzilla-daemon at bugzilla.ximian.com
Wed Apr 18 09:01:54 EDT 2007


Please do not reply to this email- if you want to comment on the bug, go to the
URL shown below and enter your comments there.

Changed by gert.driesen at pandora.be.

http://bugzilla.ximian.com/show_bug.cgi?id=79434

--- shadow/79434	2007-04-17 11:01:53.000000000 -0400
+++ shadow/79434.tmp.18296	2007-04-18 09:01:54.000000000 -0400
@@ -1,13 +1,13 @@
 Bug#: 79434
 Product: Mono: Compilers
 Version: 1.0
 OS: unknown
 OS Details: 
-Status: CLOSED   
-Resolution: FIXED
+Status: REOPENED   
+Resolution: 
 Severity: Unknown
 Priority: Minor
 Component: C#
 AssignedTo: mono-bugs at ximian.com                            
 ReportedBy: joncham at gmail.com               
 QAContact: mono-bugs at ximian.com
@@ -104,6 +104,33 @@
 
 ------- Additional Comments From miguel at ximian.com  2007-03-20 18:25 -------
 Please commit + close
 
 ------- Additional Comments From billholmes54 at gmail.com  2007-03-21 13:55 -------
 commited to svn - r74749
+
+------- Additional Comments From gert.driesen at pandora.be  2007-04-18 09:01 -------
+On MS, the order is different if you run the test app on 1.1 or 2.0:
+
+MS .NET 2.0:
+test2
+get_test1
+test3
+set_test4
+get_test4
+get_test5
+set_test5
+
+MS .NET 1.1:
+set_test5
+get_test5
+get_test4
+set_test4
+test3
+get_test1
+test2
+OK
+
+Also, compiling an application using csc 1.0 and then forcing it to 
+run on the 2.0 CLR (by setting the supportedRuntime in the 
+application configuration file) yields the same result as an 
+application built using csc 2.0.


More information about the mono-bugs mailing list