[Mono-bugs] [Bug 79434][Min] Changed - [PATCH] Order of members does not match MS
bugzilla-daemon at bugzilla.ximian.com
bugzilla-daemon at bugzilla.ximian.com
Wed Apr 18 09:01:54 EDT 2007
Please do not reply to this email- if you want to comment on the bug, go to the
URL shown below and enter your comments there.
Changed by gert.driesen at pandora.be.
http://bugzilla.ximian.com/show_bug.cgi?id=79434
--- shadow/79434 2007-04-17 11:01:53.000000000 -0400
+++ shadow/79434.tmp.18296 2007-04-18 09:01:54.000000000 -0400
@@ -1,13 +1,13 @@
Bug#: 79434
Product: Mono: Compilers
Version: 1.0
OS: unknown
OS Details:
-Status: CLOSED
-Resolution: FIXED
+Status: REOPENED
+Resolution:
Severity: Unknown
Priority: Minor
Component: C#
AssignedTo: mono-bugs at ximian.com
ReportedBy: joncham at gmail.com
QAContact: mono-bugs at ximian.com
@@ -104,6 +104,33 @@
------- Additional Comments From miguel at ximian.com 2007-03-20 18:25 -------
Please commit + close
------- Additional Comments From billholmes54 at gmail.com 2007-03-21 13:55 -------
commited to svn - r74749
+
+------- Additional Comments From gert.driesen at pandora.be 2007-04-18 09:01 -------
+On MS, the order is different if you run the test app on 1.1 or 2.0:
+
+MS .NET 2.0:
+test2
+get_test1
+test3
+set_test4
+get_test4
+get_test5
+set_test5
+
+MS .NET 1.1:
+set_test5
+get_test5
+get_test4
+set_test4
+test3
+get_test1
+test2
+OK
+
+Also, compiling an application using csc 1.0 and then forcing it to
+run on the 2.0 CLR (by setting the supportedRuntime in the
+application configuration file) yields the same result as an
+application built using csc 2.0.
More information about the mono-bugs
mailing list