[Mono-bugs] [Bug 81351][Nor] Changed - [System.Core] linq except method flawed

bugzilla-daemon at bugzilla.ximian.com bugzilla-daemon at bugzilla.ximian.com
Wed Apr 11 06:05:11 EDT 2007


Please do not reply to this email- if you want to comment on the bug, go to the
URL shown below and enter your comments there.

Changed by marek.safar at seznam.cz.

http://bugzilla.ximian.com/show_bug.cgi?id=81351

--- shadow/81351	2007-04-11 06:02:44.000000000 -0400
+++ shadow/81351.tmp.25140	2007-04-11 06:05:11.000000000 -0400
@@ -11,13 +11,13 @@
 AssignedTo: rharinath at novell.com                            
 ReportedBy: ijbema at fmf.nl               
 QAContact: mono-bugs at ximian.com
 TargetMilestone: ---
 URL: 
 Cc: 
-Summary: linq except method flawed
+Summary: [System.Core] linq except method flawed
 
 I cannot find official documentation of the linq methods (if anyone could
 point me to them i'd be much obliged), but the following just seems plain
 wrong to me:
 
 first:0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
@@ -58,6 +58,12 @@
 
 I'm also willing to implement it, but i have no idea about procedures etc
 (that is, i'm willing to code, but atm don't have time to do all the
 politics, if someone emails me i'm perfectly willing to write working code).
 
 Also, shouldn't there be unit tests for these functions?
+
+------- Additional Comments From marek.safar at seznam.cz  2007-04-11 06:05 -------
+A. It is not that hard to create a patch with changes which contains a
+fix.
+B. Yes, there should be unit tests for each method. So, if you write
+unit we can do all "merge/build magic".


More information about the mono-bugs mailing list