[Mono-bugs] [Bug 81351][Nor] Changed - [System.Core] linq except method flawed
bugzilla-daemon at bugzilla.ximian.com
bugzilla-daemon at bugzilla.ximian.com
Wed Apr 11 06:05:11 EDT 2007
Please do not reply to this email- if you want to comment on the bug, go to the
URL shown below and enter your comments there.
Changed by marek.safar at seznam.cz.
http://bugzilla.ximian.com/show_bug.cgi?id=81351
--- shadow/81351 2007-04-11 06:02:44.000000000 -0400
+++ shadow/81351.tmp.25140 2007-04-11 06:05:11.000000000 -0400
@@ -11,13 +11,13 @@
AssignedTo: rharinath at novell.com
ReportedBy: ijbema at fmf.nl
QAContact: mono-bugs at ximian.com
TargetMilestone: ---
URL:
Cc:
-Summary: linq except method flawed
+Summary: [System.Core] linq except method flawed
I cannot find official documentation of the linq methods (if anyone could
point me to them i'd be much obliged), but the following just seems plain
wrong to me:
first:0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
@@ -58,6 +58,12 @@
I'm also willing to implement it, but i have no idea about procedures etc
(that is, i'm willing to code, but atm don't have time to do all the
politics, if someone emails me i'm perfectly willing to write working code).
Also, shouldn't there be unit tests for these functions?
+
+------- Additional Comments From marek.safar at seznam.cz 2007-04-11 06:05 -------
+A. It is not that hard to create a patch with changes which contains a
+fix.
+B. Yes, there should be unit tests for each method. So, if you write
+unit we can do all "merge/build magic".
More information about the mono-bugs
mailing list