[Mono-bugs] [Bug 81322][Nor] Changed - [2.0] Overriding ConfigurationElement.Reset difference in web apps

bugzilla-daemon at bugzilla.ximian.com bugzilla-daemon at bugzilla.ximian.com
Fri Apr 6 13:26:07 EDT 2007


Please do not reply to this email- if you want to comment on the bug, go to the
URL shown below and enter your comments there.

Changed by gert.driesen at pandora.be.

http://bugzilla.ximian.com/show_bug.cgi?id=81322

--- shadow/81322	2007-04-06 05:11:19.000000000 -0400
+++ shadow/81322.tmp.6816	2007-04-06 13:26:07.000000000 -0400
@@ -2,22 +2,22 @@
 Product: Mono: Class Libraries
 Version: 1.2
 OS: GNU/Linux [Other]
 OS Details: 
 Status: NEW   
 Resolution: 
-Severity: 
+Severity: Unknown
 Priority: Normal
-Component: Sys.Web
-AssignedTo: mhabersack at novell.com                            
+Component: Configuration
+AssignedTo: toshok at ximian.com                            
 ReportedBy: gert.driesen at pandora.be               
-QAContact: mono-bugs at ximian.com
+QAContact: toshok at ximian.com
 TargetMilestone: ---
 URL: 
 Cc: 
-Summary: Custom configuration  sections not processed correctly
+Summary: [2.0] Overriding ConfigurationElement.Reset difference in web apps
 
 Custom configuration sections defined in web.config are not processed 
 correctly. 
 
 On the 1.0 profile, a section backed by an IConfigurationSectionHandler 
 is not found at all.
@@ -34,6 +34,17 @@
 Both tests work fine when run on MS.
 
 ------- Additional Comments From gert.driesen at pandora.be  2007-04-06 05:11 -------
 Created an attachment (id=19011)
 Gzipped tar containing repro
 
+
+------- Additional Comments From gert.driesen at pandora.be  2007-04-06 13:26 -------
+Hmm, forget about the 1.0 profile issue: The web configuration file 
+in my repro is called "Web.Config" and on the 1.0 profile (on unix) 
+we do not scan for a web config file with that exact casing (we do 
+on 2.0 though).
+
+The 2.0 problem appears to be due to the fact that I override 
+ConfigurationElement.Reset in my ConfigurationSection. Apparently 
+our behaviour of that method does match that of MS. I tried to 
+create a smaller repro (non-web) but did not succeed.


More information about the mono-bugs mailing list