[Mono-bugs] [Bug 77502][Wis] New - gmcs warnings differ from csc

[bugzilla-daemon at bugzilla.ximian.com]

Please do not reply to this email- if you want to comment on the bug, go to the
URL shown below and enter your comments there.

Changed by flipper98 at gmx.net.

http://bugzilla.ximian.com/show_bug.cgi?id=77502

--- shadow/77502	2006-02-08 11:07:57.000000000 -0500
+++ shadow/77502.tmp.13791	2006-02-08 11:07:57.000000000 -0500
@@ -0,0 +1,46 @@
+Bug#: 77502
+Product: Mono: Compilers
+Version: 1.1
+OS: 
+OS Details: 
+Status: NEW   
+Resolution: 
+Severity: 
+Priority: Wishlist
+Component: C#
+AssignedTo: rharinath at novell.com                            
+ReportedBy: flipper98 at gmx.net               
+QAContact: mono-bugs at ximian.com
+TargetMilestone: ---
+URL: 
+Cc: 
+Summary: gmcs warnings differ from csc
+
+Please fill in this template when reporting a bug, unless you know what you
+are doing.
+Description of Problem:
+i have a class with several fields (marked with a glade [Widget] attribute)
+. These fields remain uninitialized until libglade initializes them via
+reflection at runtime.
+when compiling this code, gmcs spits out a CS0169 warning wheras csc
+outputs warning CS0649.
+
+for reference:
+http://msdn2.microsoft.com/x7sk421w(en-US,VS.80).aspx
+http://msdn2.microsoft.com/03b5270t(en-US,VS.80).aspx
+
+Steps to reproduce the problem:
+1. add a field to a class and leave it uninitialized.
+   (e.g. [Widget] Button btn1;
+2. compile the code and compare csc and gmcs output.
+
+Actual Results:
+different warning codes
+
+Expected Results:
+equal warning codes
+
+How often does this happen? 
+always
+
+Additional Information: