[Mono-bugs] [Bug 78075][Nor] Changed - Mono SSL stack performance/tuning issues

bugzilla-daemon at bugzilla.ximian.com bugzilla-daemon at bugzilla.ximian.com
Wed Apr 12 16:55:20 EDT 2006


Please do not reply to this email- if you want to comment on the bug, go to the
URL shown below and enter your comments there.

Changed by sebastien at ximian.com.

http://bugzilla.ximian.com/show_bug.cgi?id=78075

--- shadow/78075	2006-04-12 16:31:34.000000000 -0400
+++ shadow/78075.tmp.29357	2006-04-12 16:55:20.000000000 -0400
@@ -1,12 +1,12 @@
 Bug#: 78075
 Product: Mono: Class Libraries
 Version: 1.1
 OS: unknown
 OS Details: 
-Status: REOPENED   
+Status: NEEDINFO   
 Resolution: 
 Severity: Unknown
 Priority: Normal
 Component: Mono.Security
 AssignedTo: miguel at ximian.com                            
 ReportedBy: naresh at ximian.com               
@@ -252,6 +252,22 @@
 likely that I was using a 256 bit key (I don't know how to check).  We
 can try to knock down our encryption to 128 bit, but I still think
 this needs fixed.
 
 ------- Additional Comments From james at ximian.com  2006-04-12 16:31 -------
 Sorry, not 33 times slower.  Like 13 times slower or something :)
+
+------- Additional Comments From sebastien at ximian.com  2006-04-12 16:55 -------
+Am I right in assuming that ZMD 6.6.2 wasn't using SSL ? or wasn't
+using Mono ? or both ?
+
+If it was using SSL, what cipher were being used ? (you can use
+ethereal and look at the ServerHello message to see the selected cipher).
+
+Mono's implementation of AES is slow but, even if we matched MS
+performance on it, it would only be 4 times faster (i.e. still very
+slow compared to the RC4 results). Unless 128bits aren't enough (and I
+rarely heard good reasons for that) 256bits is an overkill ;-)
+
+IIRC Apache/mod_ssl can be configured to restrict the ciphers being
+used. You should play with the settings that I bet the best results
+will be with RSA/RC4-128/MD5.


More information about the mono-bugs mailing list