[Mono-bugs] [Bug 76262][Nor] Changed - [GMCS] Mono runtime assert in Nemerle bootstrap

bugzilla-daemon at bugzilla.ximian.com bugzilla-daemon at bugzilla.ximian.com
Thu Sep 29 13:30:09 EDT 2005


Please do not reply to this email- if you want to comment on the bug, go to the
URL shown below and enter your comments there.

Changed by nazgul at omega.pl.

http://bugzilla.ximian.com/show_bug.cgi?id=76262

--- shadow/76262	2005-09-29 13:23:10.000000000 -0400
+++ shadow/76262.tmp.16816	2005-09-29 13:30:09.000000000 -0400
@@ -11,13 +11,12 @@
 AssignedTo: mono-bugs at ximian.com                            
 ReportedBy: nazgul at omega.pl               
 QAContact: mono-bugs at ximian.com
 TargetMilestone: ---
 URL: 
 Summary: [GMCS] Mono runtime assert in Nemerle bootstrap
-BugsThisDependsOn: 75974
 
 Please fill in this template when reporting a bug, unless you know what you
 are doing.
 Description of Problem:
 class Continuation<R,A>
 {
@@ -213,6 +212,20 @@
 worse.
 
 You can easily compare with mono 1.1.9, where performance is ok.
 
 ------- Additional Comments From martin at ximian.com  2005-09-29 13:23 -------
 Ok, I'll have at this duplicate MemberRef problem tomorrow.
+
+------- Additional Comments From nazgul at omega.pl  2005-09-29 13:30 -------
+Well, some time ago we were curious if you'd accept such a big... 
+testcase :D
+I think that after generics code gets stabilized again it would be a 
+great idea to have Nemerle bootstrap at hand to test the changes. As 
+we can see, it would be especially useful in tracking performance 
+regressions.
+
+We are looking forward for implementation of code sharing, but it 
+seems that this is not a highest priority issue - the performance on 
+MS.NET is not very different currently than on mono, but this might 
+just mean that their implementation is broken somewhere. And thanks 
+very much for your work on all this stuff! :-)


More information about the mono-bugs mailing list