[Mono-bugs] [Bug 74840][Maj] Changed - Blocking Read() does not return if NetworkStream is closed underneath it
bugzilla-daemon@bugzilla.ximian.com
bugzilla-daemon@bugzilla.ximian.com
Mon, 9 May 2005 14:11:47 -0400 (EDT)
Please do not reply to this email- if you want to comment on the bug, go to the
URL shown below and enter your comments there.
Changed by joeshaw@novell.com.
http://bugzilla.ximian.com/show_bug.cgi?id=74840
--- shadow/74840 2005-05-05 21:29:33.000000000 -0400
+++ shadow/74840.tmp.7191 2005-05-09 14:11:47.000000000 -0400
@@ -82,6 +82,15 @@
<gonzalo> All clients closed
<gonzalo> Read 2
<gonzalo> Read 2 bytes
<gonzalo> Reading data
<gonzalo> and then a nullref + objectdisposed
<gonzalo> so our behavior matches MS except for that extra nullref
+
+------- Additional Comments From joeshaw@novell.com 2005-05-09 14:11 -------
+Sigh. That behavior is so broken.
+
+What are my alternatives here? I'd rather not do async IO, since each
+connection is being handled by its own thread and I don't need the
+added complexity. Can I do a Thread.Abort() on that thread after
+closing the socket? Will that cause the Read() to end? What would
+you recommend?