[Mono-bugs] [Bug 75555][Wis] New - Not fully implemented the Microsoft.VisualBasic namespace

bugzilla-daemon at bugzilla.ximian.com bugzilla-daemon at bugzilla.ximian.com
Fri Jul 15 06:22:14 EDT 2005

Please do not reply to this email- if you want to comment on the bug, go to the
URL shown below and enter your comments there.

Changed by spek at impaq.com.pl.


--- shadow/75555	2005-07-15 06:22:14.000000000 -0400
+++ shadow/75555.tmp.28265	2005-07-15 06:22:14.000000000 -0400
@@ -0,0 +1,46 @@
+Bug#: 75555
+Product: Mono: Class Libraries
+Version: 1.1
+OS: Red Hat 9.0
+OS Details: Fedora Core
+Status: NEW   
+Priority: Wishlist
+Component: VB Runtime
+AssignedTo: mono-bugs at ximian.com                            
+ReportedBy: spek at impaq.com.pl               
+QAContact: mono-bugs at ximian.com
+TargetMilestone: ---
+Summary: Not fully implemented the Microsoft.VisualBasic namespace
+Description of Problem:
+It seems that the Microsoft.VisualBasic namespace is not fully implemented 
+under Mono for Linux. 
+Steps to reproduce the problem:
+I found different behaviors of following methods: Val, FileOpen. I'm 
+afraid of more unexpected bugs with not implementd methods.
+Actual Results:
+Expected Results:
+I'm expecting that all classes/methods/functions from 
+Microsoft.VisualBasic namespace have the same behavior that their 
+equivalents in Microsoft's .NET.
+How often does this happen? 
+When application calls not implemented method.
+Additional Information:
+Inside my source I have the hundreds references to Val, LCase, InStr, 
+Replace, Dir, Today, Str, Len, Format, Now, Trim, Kill, CopyFile and other 
+methods from this namespace. 
+The main problem is that I don't know which else from this namespace 
+doesn't work (or work different that expected). This implies that my 
+application can run unpredictable when something run different that should 

More information about the mono-bugs mailing list