[Mono-bugs] [Bug 71001][Nor] Changed - xsp.exe virtual size grows without bound -- large messages
bugzilla-daemon@bugzilla.ximian.com
bugzilla-daemon@bugzilla.ximian.com
Mon, 31 Jan 2005 13:45:28 -0500 (EST)
Please do not reply to this email- if you want to comment on the bug, go to the
URL shown below and enter your comments there.
Changed by matt.hargett@logiclibrary.com.
http://bugzilla.ximian.com/show_bug.cgi?id=71001
--- shadow/71001 2005-01-30 14:28:56.000000000 -0500
+++ shadow/71001.tmp.1719 2005-01-31 13:45:28.000000000 -0500
@@ -1,13 +1,13 @@
Bug#: 71001
Product: Mono: Runtime
Version: unspecified
OS: SLES 9
OS Details: AMD-64
-Status: RESOLVED
-Resolution: WONTFIX
+Status: REOPENED
+Resolution:
Severity: Unknown
Priority: Normal
Component: misc
AssignedTo: mono-bugs@ximian.com
ReportedBy: jrodman@ximian-bugzilla.spamportal.net
QAContact: mono-bugs@ximian.com
@@ -81,6 +81,22 @@
it is the same issue we have faced in the past due to memory
fragmentation.
There are other solutions, like what iFolder uses, which is to
transfer chunks in 64k of data
+
+------- Additional Comments From matt.hargett@logiclibrary.com 2005-01-31 13:45 -------
+Does this mean this will remain unresolved even if we purchase the
+mono incident support and attempt to use it for this issue?
+
+Microsoft .NET does not exhibit this problem, though I seem to recall
+that Windows NT 4.0's heap had this kind of problem up intil SP3 or
+SP4. A similar problem was surmountable in that instance, at least. I
+am curious why it is not in this instance? This seems to be a major
+barrier to mono being used in server-based applications that require a
+decent amount of uptime or scalability.
+
+Nevertheless, we appreciate this issue being investigated and look
+forward to answers to the questions above.
+
+Thanks!