[Mono-bugs] [Bug 71766][Cri] New - RETURN_VALUE from stored procedure exception.
bugzilla-daemon@bugzilla.ximian.com
bugzilla-daemon@bugzilla.ximian.com
Tue, 25 Jan 2005 21:58:04 -0500 (EST)
Please do not reply to this email- if you want to comment on the bug, go to the
URL shown below and enter your comments there.
Changed by andypalmer@adelphia.net.
http://bugzilla.ximian.com/show_bug.cgi?id=71766
--- shadow/71766 2005-01-25 21:58:04.000000000 -0500
+++ shadow/71766.tmp.11768 2005-01-25 21:58:04.000000000 -0500
@@ -0,0 +1,112 @@
+Bug#: 71766
+Product: Mono: Class Libraries
+Version: 1.0
+OS: Red Hat 9.0
+OS Details:
+Status: NEW
+Resolution:
+Severity:
+Priority: Critical
+Component: Sys.Data.SqlClient
+AssignedTo: rodrigo@novell.com
+ReportedBy: andypalmer@adelphia.net
+QAContact: mono-bugs@ximian.com
+TargetMilestone: ---
+URL:
+Cc:
+Summary: RETURN_VALUE from stored procedure exception.
+
+Please fill in this template when reporting a bug, unless you know what you are doing.
+Description of Problem:
+ Trying to get a return value from a SQL 7.0 stored procedure throws an exception ''int' is not a recognized CURSOR option.'
+
+
+Steps to reproduce the problem:
+1. Create simple stored proc:
+
+CREATE PROCEDURE sp_ReturnValue @inVal int
+AS
+BEGIN
+ return(@inVal)
+END
+
+2.
+Example code:
+System.Data.SqlClient.SqlConnection conn=null;
+try
+{
+ String connstr = PUT SOMETHING HERE;
+ conn=new System.Data.SqlClient.SqlConnection(connstr);
+ conn.Open();
+ System.Data.SqlClient.SqlCommand cmd=
+ new System.Data.SqlClient.SqlCommand();
+ cmd.CommandText = "sp_ReturnValue";
+ cmd.CommandType = System.Data.CommandType.StoredProcedure;
+ cmd.Connection = conn;
+ SqlParameter parm=
+ cmd.Parameters.Add("@inVal",System.Data.SqlDbType.Int);
+ parm.Value = 2;
+ parm = cmd.Parameters.Add("RETURN_VALUE",
+ System.Data.SqlDbType.Int);
+ parm.Direction = System.Data.ParameterDirection.ReturnValue;
+ System.Data.SqlClient.SqlDataReader rs = cmd.ExecuteReader();
+ System.Int32 x =
+ (System.Int32)cmd.Parameters["RETURN_VALUE"].Value;
+ Console.WriteLine(x);
+ rs.Close();
+ cmd.Parameters.Clear();
+ conn.Close();
+}
+catch(Exception e)
+{
+ Console.WriteLine(e.StackTrace);
+ Console.WriteLine(e.Message);
+}
+finally
+{
+ try { conn.Close(); } catch(Exception e){};
+}
+
+3. Throws exception every time.
+
+Actual Results:
+'int' is not a recognized CURSOR option.
+
+in <0x0011b> System.Data.SqlClient.SqlConnection:ErrorHandler
+(object,Mono.Data.Tds.Protocol.TdsInternalErrorMessageEventArgs)
+in <0x00069> (wrapper delegate-invoke)
+System.MulticastDelegate:invoke_void_object_TdsInternalErrorMessageEventArgs
+(object,Mono.Data.Tds.Protocol.TdsInternalErrorMessageEventArgs)
+in <0x0001e> Mono.Data.Tds.Protocol.Tds:OnTdsErrorMessage
+(Mono.Data.Tds.Protocol.TdsInternalErrorMessageEventArgs)
+in <0x00056> (wrapper remoting-invoke-with-check)
+Mono.Data.Tds.Protocol.Tds:OnTdsErrorMessage
+(Mono.Data.Tds.Protocol.TdsInternalErrorMessageEventArgs)
+in <0x00276> Mono.Data.Tds.Protocol.Tds:ProcessMessage
+(Mono.Data.Tds.Protocol.TdsPacketSubType)
+in <0x00052> (wrapper remoting-invoke-with-check)
+Mono.Data.Tds.Protocol.Tds:ProcessMessage
+(Mono.Data.Tds.Protocol.TdsPacketSubType)
+in <0x0015f> Mono.Data.Tds.Protocol.Tds:ProcessSubPacket ()
+in <0x00050> Mono.Data.Tds.Protocol.Tds:NextResult ()
+in <0x00089> System.Data.SqlClient.SqlDataReader:NextResult ()
+in <0x0005d> (wrapper remoting-invoke-with-check)
+System.Data.SqlClient.SqlDataReader:NextResult ()
+in <0x00122> System.Data.SqlClient.SqlDataReader:.ctor
+(System.Data.SqlClient.SqlCommand)
+in <0x00056> (wrapper remoting-invoke-with-check)
+System.Data.SqlClient.SqlDataReader:.ctor (System.Data.SqlClient.SqlCommand)
+in <0x000a2> System.Data.SqlClient.SqlCommand:ExecuteReader
+(System.Data.CommandBehavior)
+in <0x00054> (wrapper remoting-invoke-with-check)
+System.Data.SqlClient.SqlCommand:ExecuteReader (System.Data.CommandBehavior)
+in <0x0017d> TestReturnValue.Program:Main (string[])
+
+Expected Results:
+
+returns the return value of the stored proc.
+
+How often does this happen?
+Everytime.
+
+Additional Information: