[Mono-bugs] [Bug 67213][Min] New - HttpResponse.SuppressContent incompatibility with MS.NET Framework

bugzilla-daemon@bugzilla.ximian.com bugzilla-daemon@bugzilla.ximian.com
Thu, 30 Sep 2004 09:57:09 -0400 (EDT)


Please do not reply to this email- if you want to comment on the bug, go to the
URL shown below and enter your comments there.

Changed by tha@adv.magwien.gv.at.

http://bugzilla.ximian.com/show_bug.cgi?id=67213

--- shadow/67213	2004-09-30 09:57:09.000000000 -0400
+++ shadow/67213.tmp.31754	2004-09-30 09:57:09.000000000 -0400
@@ -0,0 +1,66 @@
+Bug#: 67213
+Product: Mono: Class Libraries
+Version: unspecified
+OS: other
+OS Details: Fedora Core 2
+Status: NEW   
+Resolution: 
+Severity: 
+Priority: Minor
+Component: Sys.Web
+AssignedTo: mono-bugs@ximian.com                            
+ReportedBy: tha@adv.magwien.gv.at               
+QAContact: mono-bugs@ximian.com
+TargetMilestone: ---
+URL: 
+Cc: 
+Summary: HttpResponse.SuppressContent incompatibility with MS.NET Framework
+
+Mono Runtime: 1.0.2
+
+Description of Problem:
+
+  Class: HttpResponse
+  Property: SuppressContent
+
+  When setting HttpResponse.SuppressContent to true after Headers have 
+been sent, an HttpException ("Headers already sent.") is thrown. Whereas 
+with MS.NET on Windows/IIS there is no Exception thrown.
+
+Steps to reproduce the problem:
+  1. Create a ASP.NET - Web Application with one aspx-page
+  2. Put the following code into Page_Load event handler:
+     //***************Code Snippet**************
+			Response.AddHeader("testhdr", "testval");
+			Response.Flush();
+			Response.SuppressContent=true;
+     //***************Code Snippet End**************
+  3. Start xsp and Request the .aspx
+
+
+Actual Results:
+    An HttpException ("Headers already sent.") is thrown and the browser 
+shows:
+      Server Error 500
+
+      Your client sent a request that was not understood by this server. 
+
+Expected Results:
+   Empty Page
+
+How often does this happen? 
+    always reproducible  
+
+Additional Information:
+ This is my first contribution to mono. So, if there is something missing 
+in this report, just let me know.
+
+I gave a minor Priority because I think that the mono-implementation is 
+more correct than MS' and the behavior of SuppressContent isn't documented 
+clearly by MS. Anyhow there is an incompatibility between MS.NET and Mono.
+
+Thanks for your incredible work!
+
+Cheers,
+
+Theo