[Mono-bugs] [Bug 66614][Maj] Changed - apparent deadlock in runtime

bugzilla-daemon@bugzilla.ximian.com bugzilla-daemon@bugzilla.ximian.com
Thu, 23 Sep 2004 17:55:46 -0400 (EDT)


Please do not reply to this email- if you want to comment on the bug, go to the
URL shown below and enter your comments there.

Changed by scott.mohekey@gmail.com.

http://bugzilla.ximian.com/show_bug.cgi?id=66614

--- shadow/66614	2004-09-23 13:21:08.000000000 -0400
+++ shadow/66614.tmp.22304	2004-09-23 17:55:46.000000000 -0400
@@ -10,12 +10,13 @@
 Component: misc
 AssignedTo: mono-bugs@ximian.com                            
 ReportedBy: james@ximian.com               
 QAContact: mono-bugs@ximian.com
 TargetMilestone: ---
 URL: 
+Cc: david.mitchell@telogis.com,scott.mohekey@gmail.com,scott.mohekey@telogis.com
 Summary: apparent deadlock in runtime
 
 I'm hitting what appears to be a deadlock in the runtime.  All my threads
 appear to be haulted, and the application does not repsond to ctrl-c (or
 anything else).  I attached with gdb, and got the following stack trace.
 
@@ -80,6 +81,31 @@
 
 ------- Additional Comments From james@ximian.com  2004-09-23 13:18 -------
 Oh, /lib/tls/libc.so.6 has NPTL.  So I do have it :)
 
 ------- Additional Comments From james@ximian.com  2004-09-23 13:21 -------
 Also, using GC_DONT_GC=1 seems to "fix" the deadlock problem.
+
+------- Additional Comments From scott.mohekey@gmail.com  2004-09-23 17:55 -------
+This is a known (if ignored) bug. First mentioned here
+(http://lists.ximian.com/archives/public/mono-devel-list/2004-June/006183.html),
+originally reported on Gentoo
+(http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=54603), reported on this
+bugzilla here (http://bugzilla.ximian.com/show_bug.cgi?id=60576),
+incorrectly identified here
+(http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=63734), clarified (and
+ignored) some what here
+(http://lists.ximian.com/archives/public/mono-devel-list/2004-September/007824.html),
+finally to end up re reported here.
+
+Here is some possible evidence of this NOT being an NPTL bug, but a
+mono/libgc bug that is easier to reproduce when using NPTL
+(http://lists.ximian.com/archives/public/mono-list/2004-May/020061.html).
+
+This thread also makes for interesting reading
+(https://listman.redhat.com/archives/phil-list/2002-November/msg00096.html),
+as does this one
+(http://www.redhat.com/archives/phil-list/2003-December/msg00023.html).
+
+I've done a lot of leg work with this bug, but I need some help here.
+When are the mono guys going to look into this, instead of just saying
+"it's a bug in nptl".