[Mono-bugs] [Bug 68326][Nor] Changed - [GMCS] Generic constraint semantics is different than csc

[bugzilla-daemon@bugzilla.ximian.com]

Please do not reply to this email- if you want to comment on the bug, go to the
URL shown below and enter your comments there.

Changed by bmaurer@users.sf.net.

http://bugzilla.ximian.com/show_bug.cgi?id=68326

--- shadow/68326	2004-10-14 09:24:57.000000000 -0400
+++ shadow/68326.tmp.29664	2004-10-14 11:06:23.000000000 -0400
@@ -1,23 +1,23 @@
 Bug#: 68326
 Product: Mono: Compilers
 Version: unspecified
-OS: 
+OS: unknown
 OS Details: 
 Status: NEW   
 Resolution: 
 Severity: Unknown
-Priority: Critical
+Priority: Normal
 Component: C#
 AssignedTo: mono-bugs@ximian.com                            
 ReportedBy: rudi@lambda-computing.com               
 QAContact: mono-bugs@ximian.com
 TargetMilestone: ---
 URL: 
 Cc: 
-Summary: Generic constraint semantics is different than in microsoft.net
+Summary: [GMCS] Generic constraint semantics is different than csc
 
 In the C# whidbey beta, structs automatically satisfy the new() generic 
 constraint even if they do not have an empty constructor. This makes 
 sense since structs always have an empty constructor automatically 
 generated that sets all fields to its default value.