[Mono-bugs] [Bug 68326][Cri] New - Generic constraint semantics is different than in microsoft.net

[bugzilla-daemon@bugzilla.ximian.com]

Please do not reply to this email- if you want to comment on the bug, go to the
URL shown below and enter your comments there.

Changed by rudi@lambda-computing.com.

http://bugzilla.ximian.com/show_bug.cgi?id=68326

--- shadow/68326	2004-10-14 09:24:57.000000000 -0400
+++ shadow/68326.tmp.27564	2004-10-14 09:24:57.000000000 -0400
@@ -0,0 +1,24 @@
+Bug#: 68326
+Product: Mono: Compilers
+Version: unspecified
+OS: 
+OS Details: 
+Status: NEW   
+Resolution: 
+Severity: Unknown
+Priority: Critical
+Component: C#
+AssignedTo: mono-bugs@ximian.com                            
+ReportedBy: rudi@lambda-computing.com               
+QAContact: mono-bugs@ximian.com
+TargetMilestone: ---
+URL: 
+Cc: 
+Summary: Generic constraint semantics is different than in microsoft.net
+
+In the C# whidbey beta, structs automatically satisfy the new() generic 
+constraint even if they do not have an empty constructor. This makes 
+sense since structs always have an empty constructor automatically 
+generated that sets all fields to its default value. 
+ 
+In mono this is not the case.