[Mono-bugs] [Bug 68326][Nor] Changed - [GMCS] Generic constraint semantics is different than csc
bugzilla-daemon@bugzilla.ximian.com
bugzilla-daemon@bugzilla.ximian.com
Mon, 15 Nov 2004 02:20:32 -0500 (EST)
Please do not reply to this email- if you want to comment on the bug, go to the
URL shown below and enter your comments there.
Changed by martin@ximian.com.
http://bugzilla.ximian.com/show_bug.cgi?id=68326
--- shadow/68326 2004-10-14 11:06:23.000000000 -0400
+++ shadow/68326.tmp.7694 2004-11-15 02:20:32.000000000 -0500
@@ -5,13 +5,13 @@
OS Details:
Status: NEW
Resolution:
Severity: Unknown
Priority: Normal
Component: C#
-AssignedTo: mono-bugs@ximian.com
+AssignedTo: martin@ximian.com
ReportedBy: rudi@lambda-computing.com
QAContact: mono-bugs@ximian.com
TargetMilestone: ---
URL:
Cc:
Summary: [GMCS] Generic constraint semantics is different than csc
@@ -19,6 +19,9 @@
In the C# whidbey beta, structs automatically satisfy the new() generic
constraint even if they do not have an empty constructor. This makes
sense since structs always have an empty constructor automatically
generated that sets all fields to its default value.
In mono this is not the case.
+
+------- Additional Comments From martin@ximian.com 2004-11-15 02:20 -------
+Easy.