[Mono-bugs] [Bug 68326][Nor] Changed - [GMCS] Generic constraint semantics is different than csc

bugzilla-daemon@bugzilla.ximian.com bugzilla-daemon@bugzilla.ximian.com
Mon, 15 Nov 2004 02:20:32 -0500 (EST)


Please do not reply to this email- if you want to comment on the bug, go to the
URL shown below and enter your comments there.

Changed by martin@ximian.com.

http://bugzilla.ximian.com/show_bug.cgi?id=68326

--- shadow/68326	2004-10-14 11:06:23.000000000 -0400
+++ shadow/68326.tmp.7694	2004-11-15 02:20:32.000000000 -0500
@@ -5,13 +5,13 @@
 OS Details: 
 Status: NEW   
 Resolution: 
 Severity: Unknown
 Priority: Normal
 Component: C#
-AssignedTo: mono-bugs@ximian.com                            
+AssignedTo: martin@ximian.com                            
 ReportedBy: rudi@lambda-computing.com               
 QAContact: mono-bugs@ximian.com
 TargetMilestone: ---
 URL: 
 Cc: 
 Summary: [GMCS] Generic constraint semantics is different than csc
@@ -19,6 +19,9 @@
 In the C# whidbey beta, structs automatically satisfy the new() generic 
 constraint even if they do not have an empty constructor. This makes 
 sense since structs always have an empty constructor automatically 
 generated that sets all fields to its default value. 
  
 In mono this is not the case.
+
+------- Additional Comments From martin@ximian.com  2004-11-15 02:20 -------
+Easy.