[Mono-bugs] [Bug 35894][Wis] Changed - reduce size of produced binaries
Thu, 13 May 2004 05:04:49 -0400 (EDT)
Please do not reply to this email- if you want to comment on the bug, go to the
URL shown below and enter your comments there.
Changed by email@example.com.
--- shadow/35894 2004-05-12 22:20:08.000000000 -0400
+++ shadow/35894.tmp.17518 2004-05-13 05:04:49.000000000 -0400
@@ -69,6 +69,14 @@
think the first case is worth it (it is a 5 minute hack), but i am not
convinced at all about the second.
------- Additional Comments From firstname.lastname@example.org 2004-05-12 22:20 -------
Marek today pointed to csc doing parameter name reduction when
/optimize is passed.
+------- Additional Comments From email@example.com 2004-05-13 05:04 -------
+What is parameter name reduction?
+Anyway, the biggest issue is the debug data. It's nice to have around
+and we compile it in by default, but it's so bloated that we may
+consider disabling it if it's size is not reduced. It doesn't help
+that it was embedded inside the binary instead of keeping it separate,
+so it can't even be distributed separately.