[Mono-bugs] [Bug 35894][Wis] Changed - reduce size of produced binaries

[bugzilla-daemon@bugzilla.ximian.com]

Please do not reply to this email- if you want to comment on the bug, go to the
URL shown below and enter your comments there.

Changed by miguel@ximian.com.

http://bugzilla.ximian.com/show_bug.cgi?id=35894

--- shadow/35894	2004-01-04 21:41:47.000000000 -0500
+++ shadow/35894.tmp.13598	2004-05-12 22:20:08.000000000 -0400
@@ -1,8 +1,8 @@
 Bug#: 35894
-Product: Mono/Runtime
+Product: Mono: Runtime
 Version: unspecified
 OS: other
 OS Details: 
 Status: NEW   
 Resolution: 
 Severity: Unknown
@@ -65,6 +65,10 @@
 So, what we could do is allocate enough space for the brfalse to be a
 long jump, but if it ends up being short, we just copy everything up.
 However, this would not work so well if there were a fixup between the
  jump and the mark. Do we really save enough to make this worth it? I
 think the first case is worth it (it is a 5 minute hack), but i am not
 convinced at all about the second.
+
+------- Additional Comments From miguel@ximian.com  2004-05-12 22:20 -------
+Marek today pointed to csc doing parameter name reduction when
+/optimize is passed.