[Mono-bugs] [Bug 57151][Nor] Changed - [PATCH] We do not report CS0625

[bugzilla-daemon@bugzilla.ximian.com]

Please do not reply to this email- if you want to comment on the bug, go to the
URL shown below and enter your comments there.

Changed by rharinath@novell.com.

http://bugzilla.ximian.com/show_bug.cgi?id=57151

--- shadow/57151	2004-05-04 08:14:51.000000000 -0400
+++ shadow/57151.tmp.16978	2004-05-05 05:54:15.000000000 -0400
@@ -54,6 +54,16 @@
 Is it an error to have a `FieldOffset' without the explicit flag 
 being set?
 
 Maybe you should not `return' when you find one error. For the user, 
 it would be nice if ALL fields that needed a FieldOffset caused an 
 error with only one compilation.
+
+------- Additional Comments From rharinath@novell.com  2004-05-05 05:54 -------
+'const' fields are not added to 'fields' AFAIK.
+
+I'll have to check on CSC if it allows FieldOffset on const fields.
+In general, though, we don't seem to support applying attributes on
+constants.
+
+I'll be posting an updated patch soon.
+