[Mono-bugs] [Bug 55246][Wis] Changed - maxstack is way too high - incorrect
Sun, 7 Mar 2004 00:42:13 -0500 (EST)
Please do not reply to this email- if you want to comment on the bug, go to the
URL shown below and enter your comments there.
Changed by firstname.lastname@example.org.
--- shadow/55246 2004-03-05 23:12:45.000000000 -0500
+++ shadow/55246.tmp.13496 2004-03-07 00:42:13.000000000 -0500
@@ -2,21 +2,20 @@
Product: Mono: Compilers
OS: SUSE 9.0
OS Details: Suse 9.0
Summary: maxstack is way too high - incorrect
Please fill in this template when reporting a bug, unless you know what
you are doing.
Description of Problem:
@@ -50,6 +49,18 @@
This happens on both 0.30 and 0.30.1 and 0.30.2.
+------- Additional Comments From email@example.com 2004-03-07 00:42 -------
+first, the maxstack is really an incorrect name. The name should be
+stackupperbound. The only requirement for maxstack is that it can be
+proven that the stack will never go beyond the maxstack. Even if it
+can be proven that 9 is also an upper bound, 200348767686868686876 is
+a valid maxstack (well, it may be out of the range of the size for the
+field, but you get my point)
+I think I remember talking about this before and either Paolo or
+Miguel saying that we do not use the thing. It is designed for a
+simplistic interpeter. Am going to double check.