[Mono-bugs] [Bug 59537][Nor] Changed - improve NameTable performance

[bugzilla-daemon@bugzilla.ximian.com]

Please do not reply to this email- if you want to comment on the bug, go to the
URL shown below and enter your comments there.

Changed by miguel@ximian.com.

http://bugzilla.ximian.com/show_bug.cgi?id=59537

--- shadow/59537	2004-06-09 12:07:36.000000000 -0400
+++ shadow/59537.tmp.32547	2004-06-09 12:17:01.000000000 -0400
@@ -390,6 +390,19 @@
 
 
 I have no intention to deny the possible case that the new
 implementation is faster, but cannot agree blindly without the
 concrete data.
 
+
+------- Additional Comments From miguel@ximian.com  2004-06-09 12:17 -------
+Mordechai,
+
+    Please provide us with the data from JProfiler, we have no way
+of knowing what you are looking at, and this is where the discrepancy
+in the argumentation is taking place.
+ 
+    Lets get all the facts on the table, lets get simple samples that
+illustate the problem (it is *always* possible to extract a simpler
+test case than `run IBuySpy'), this will help us both tremendously.
+
+Miguel.