[Mono-bugs] [Bug 61390][Wis] New - Errors on mono-project.com FAQ

[bugzilla-daemon@bugzilla.ximian.com]

Please do not reply to this email- if you want to comment on the bug, go to the
URL shown below and enter your comments there.

Changed by steve@citygroup.ca.

http://bugzilla.ximian.com/show_bug.cgi?id=61390

--- shadow/61390	2004-07-10 11:43:42.000000000 -0400
+++ shadow/61390.tmp.1554	2004-07-10 11:43:42.000000000 -0400
@@ -0,0 +1,47 @@
+Bug#: 61390
+Product: Mono: Doctools
+Version: unspecified
+OS: 
+OS Details: 
+Status: NEW   
+Resolution: 
+Severity: 
+Priority: Wishlist
+Component: Website
+AssignedTo: mono-bugs@ximian.com                            
+ReportedBy: steve@citygroup.ca               
+TargetMilestone: ---
+URL: 
+Cc: 
+Summary: Errors on mono-project.com FAQ
+
+There are a number of errors on mono-project.com's FAQ pages.
+
+
+From http://mono-project.com/about/faq.html:
+
+Question 21 states: "No pieces of Mono will be ready within the next six
+months" - Obviously this isn't the case anymore.
+
+
+From http://mono-project.com/about/technical.html:
+Question 56 states: "They have many different for contributing to the
+effort" - I would assume what is mean is "many different reasons for
+contributing." 
+
+Reply #3 to this question states: "Mono does not heavily modify the windows
+registry, update system DLLs, install DLLs to the Windows/System32 path.
+Another words, I knew Mono would not cause any legacy enterprise
+applications to stop working - and it hasn't. However, our CIO er is againt
+it because of the changes that would be made to Windows 2000, such as,
+affecting security" - This is filled with grammatical and spelling errors.
+Since I'm not sure what the actual intent of this reply is (it appears to
+be written in the first person, which is in itself rather unprofessional),
+I will let the bug fixer deal with this. :)
+
+
+From http://mono-project.com/about/licensing.html:
+Question 129 states: "The runtime libraries are under the GNU Library GPL
+(LGPL)" - `LGPL' now stands for the GNU "Lesser General Public License" (as
+of version 2.1). If Mono is actually licensed under the LGPL 2.0, the
+external link should reflect this.