[Mono-bugs] [Bug 61267][Wis] Changed - why is there a -2 flag if it is standard anyway

bugzilla-daemon@bugzilla.ximian.com bugzilla-daemon@bugzilla.ximian.com
Fri, 9 Jul 2004 12:46:33 -0400 (EDT)

Please do not reply to this email- if you want to comment on the bug, go to the
URL shown below and enter your comments there.

Changed by miguel@ximian.com.


--- shadow/61267	2004-07-07 17:06:41.000000000 -0400
+++ shadow/61267.tmp.25282	2004-07-09 12:46:33.000000000 -0400
@@ -1,14 +1,14 @@
 Bug#: 61267
 Product: Mono: Compilers
 Version: unspecified
+OS: unknown
 OS Details: 
-Status: NEW   
+Status: RESOLVED   
+Resolution: NOTABUG
+Severity: Unknown
 Priority: Wishlist
 Component: C#
 AssignedTo: mono-bugs@ximian.com                            
 ReportedBy: lists@mkempka.de               
 QAContact: mono-bugs@ximian.com
 TargetMilestone: ---
@@ -20,6 +20,9 @@
 http://www.mono-project.com/using/mcs.html that you need to set the -2 flag
 to access the implemented C# 2.0 features. In my experience, compiling code
 using method conversions - which are 2.0 features - does compile without
 setting the -2 flag.
 Additionaly, there is no -1 flag. This means, there is no way to ensure
 compiling only C# 1.0 code, which is requested for interoperability.
+------- Additional Comments From miguel@ximian.com  2004-07-09 12:46 -------
+Yes, will get addressed with -langword in the futyre