[Mono-bugs] [Bug 61267][Wis] Changed - why is there a -2 flag if it is standard anyway
bugzilla-daemon@bugzilla.ximian.com
bugzilla-daemon@bugzilla.ximian.com
Fri, 9 Jul 2004 12:46:33 -0400 (EDT)
Please do not reply to this email- if you want to comment on the bug, go to the
URL shown below and enter your comments there.
Changed by miguel@ximian.com.
http://bugzilla.ximian.com/show_bug.cgi?id=61267
--- shadow/61267 2004-07-07 17:06:41.000000000 -0400
+++ shadow/61267.tmp.25282 2004-07-09 12:46:33.000000000 -0400
@@ -1,14 +1,14 @@
Bug#: 61267
Product: Mono: Compilers
Version: unspecified
-OS:
+OS: unknown
OS Details:
-Status: NEW
-Resolution:
-Severity:
+Status: RESOLVED
+Resolution: NOTABUG
+Severity: Unknown
Priority: Wishlist
Component: C#
AssignedTo: mono-bugs@ximian.com
ReportedBy: lists@mkempka.de
QAContact: mono-bugs@ximian.com
TargetMilestone: ---
@@ -20,6 +20,9 @@
http://www.mono-project.com/using/mcs.html that you need to set the -2 flag
to access the implemented C# 2.0 features. In my experience, compiling code
using method conversions - which are 2.0 features - does compile without
setting the -2 flag.
Additionaly, there is no -1 flag. This means, there is no way to ensure
compiling only C# 1.0 code, which is requested for interoperability.
+
+------- Additional Comments From miguel@ximian.com 2004-07-09 12:46 -------
+Yes, will get addressed with -langword in the futyre