[Mono-bugs] [Bug 63828][Min] Changed - System.Web.UI.WebControls.Xml
bugzilla-daemon@bugzilla.ximian.com
bugzilla-daemon@bugzilla.ximian.com
Tue, 24 Aug 2004 18:27:01 -0400 (EDT)
Please do not reply to this email- if you want to comment on the bug, go to the
URL shown below and enter your comments there.
Changed by bugzilla@thetoxiczone.com.
http://bugzilla.ximian.com/show_bug.cgi?id=63828
--- shadow/63828 2004-08-24 16:03:24.000000000 -0400
+++ shadow/63828.tmp.9734 2004-08-24 18:27:01.000000000 -0400
@@ -2,13 +2,13 @@
Product: Mono: Class Libraries
Version: unspecified
OS: SUSE 9.1
OS Details:
Status: NEW
Resolution:
-Severity:
+Severity: Unknown
Priority: Minor
Component: Sys.Web
AssignedTo: mono-bugs@ximian.com
ReportedBy: bugzilla@thetoxiczone.com
QAContact: mono-bugs@ximian.com
TargetMilestone: ---
@@ -105,6 +105,33 @@
------- Additional Comments From bugzilla@thetoxiczone.com 2004-08-24 16:03 -------
Created an attachment (id=9480)
Actual Result
+
+------- Additional Comments From bugzilla@thetoxiczone.com 2004-08-24 18:27 -------
+This appears to be the same as bug #62726 (found when looking in CVS
+to test my fix idea sorry about the duplicate, my initial pre-
+submission search did not show this), however I have now looked at
+the new source code for this fix (CVS revision 1.17) I feel that
+this fix will not fully fix the file mapping and will have
+introduced a new bug as well.
+
+I will explain the new bug as best I can.
+In method the LoadXpathDoc if documentContent has data it will
+attempt to map this as a path but this field is not for a file path
+it is for raw xml text, see LoadXmlDoc where it is used in a LoadXml.
+
+I will attach a new test case page that should flag this issue, and
+produce the same expected result as my other test case, not sure
+what the actual result will be, as I have not got round to setting
+up to build things yet.
+
+The second mapping issue will get flagged when somebody reads the
+Document property if they just set the DocumentSource property as
+this will call LoadXmlDoc. I might be able to come up with a test
+case for this if needed.
+
+While trying to get a feel for the code here and to avoid stepping
+on other fixes it looks like this issue is due to bug #55334 that
+was just invalid parameters.